In my
first article I found that there are a lot of things to be said about the topic
I decided to write about. When describing how military families interact and
how they live their lives can evoke and describe a lot of emotions. The writing
technique was exploratory, and really talked to the effect of homecoming
expectations in the eyes of the entire family. Most of the time it is good,
according to the author, and he basically takes an over view of the return
process. The family in question never once batted an eyelash that their family
member was coming home missing part of his leg. They didn’t even mention it in
their interviews prior to the plane landing. The writer touched on it briefly,
but didn’t give it much justice when he was typing the article up. He obviously
didn’t want to ask the really tough questions.
How
can you go through that mentally and come out the other side the same man. Unfortunately
the story that is told more then not is of the soldier coming home to no one.
The kids in this war are the ones taking the risks, and they don’t have the
strong family base that the older troops have, so when they get off the plane
the only people they have are their parents and a girlfriend that isn’t going
to be around much longer. This is sad beyond belief, but at least the family
looked strong. The family looked like they could deal with this change.
I think your analysis of the article that you had read was quite astute. I think that it's too bad that the journalist in question didn't have the chutzpah to ask any real questions, but I think that this article is a great start.
ReplyDelete